Comments:Obama announces plan to build roads, railroads and runways

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "This will surely put him up in..."215:45, 7 September 2010
1/6th the size of SAFETEA-LU015:35, 7 September 2010
Out The Door102:07, 7 September 2010

Comments from feedback form - "This will surely put him up in..."

This will surely put him up in the poll.s over the years, have heard many Americans say that the GOP have underinvested in the railways, roads and bridges. Ron Paul will oppose, but what doesn't he oppose? (talk)22:26, 6 September 2010

I agree with Ron Paul if he opposes. (talk)02:06, 7 September 2010

See my comment above. In 2005, the Republican-controlled Congress passed SAFETEA-LU, which invested over $280 billion over four years on road, rail, air and sea infrastructure. That has not been renewed since it expired in 2009.

The Republican-controlled Congress also passed its predecessor, TEA-21, in 1999.

This doesn't even match the annual expenditure under SAFETEA-LU. And yet you say the GOP "underinvested"?

Kitch (talk)15:37, 7 September 2010

1/6th the size of SAFETEA-LU

This is one-sixth the size of SAFETEA-LU, the Transportation Equity Act passed and signed in 2005 to last through 2009. Not even nearly the same amount spent annually under SAFETEA-LU.

America would be in a much better position if TARP and the stimulus were never passed, and instead they passed a new TEA plan for half the cost of the Stimulus bill.

Kitch (talk)15:35, 7 September 2010

Out The Door

He'll be gone in 2012.

$50 Billion dollars is a drop in the bucket. Not even $1 billion dollars per state. Given the amount of debt that the United States has accumulated, it's going to be hard pressed to put future money into infrastructure.

Sad. (talk)00:42, 7 September 2010

This is a pale reflection of the New Deal. (talk)02:07, 7 September 2010