Comments:Oversight Committee: White House attempted to influence Congressional elections
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Do you think that the administration was justified in using the Political Affairs office?[edit]
No. --99.150.96.219
Are we going to impeach them already? --Poisonous (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
The most corrupt administration since the Nixon Administration. How has Bush not been impeached??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.59.226.106 (talk) 10:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
It is next to impossible to impeach a "fear" elected president. Vote for freedom not oppression.--BurningWolf (talk) 14:56, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Ah, the old "they did/do it too makes it okay" argument. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.65.192.1 (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
A waste of time and taxpayer money? Sounds just like the use of that money that the Committee investigated --199.190.223.190 16:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
How unprecendented?[edit]
the article says that all admininstrations have done this, but doesn't say to what extent the current has outdone the others. this information would serve the article very well. - Imind (talk) 01:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)