Comments:Power line to Japanese nuclear plant completed

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Older Reactor technology117:02, 18 March 2011

Older Reactor technology

Why was Japan using older reactor technology from the US when they could have built something much more advanced themselves? (talk)06:57, 18 March 2011

And why do they need an external power line in the first place? I'm sure enough of the reactors are still working in some capacity that they would be able to deliver power to their own cooling systems. My dad didn't even have a PHD in physics and he was able to point this out from his short time working with nuclear reactors. Perhaps the reactors are already too far gone for them to consider the easy way? (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC) (talk)17:02, 18 March 2011