Comments:Rocket carrying NASA carbon dioxide satellite crashes into ocean
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
It's a conspiracy! --77.253.126.65 19:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
It might be...
[edit]This first one, an ESA satellite that was also supposed to study the source and impact of CO2 in the atmosphere, also suffered the same problem... The rocket did not deploy it. Now this one. I'm not a conspiracy nut, but two satellites, with the same goal, suffering from the same problem... It is weird, too weird to call it a coincidence.
Cost will be more than $$
[edit]What cost can we assign to our continued ignorance about the carbon cycle? Policy decisions being made today and for years to come on the basis of our limited understanding will expend many more dollars than the price tag of this failed mission.
This was too important not to have a "plan B". Surely someone must have considered that the OCO might fail. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.178.74.23 (talk • contribs)