Comments:Russia rejects latest US proposal on missile defense

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Putin and his puppet want a second cold war. The next 4 years are going to be hard on Obama. --66.229.21.217 21:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a strange view of this. The U.S. is the one attempting to setup a system to partially neutralize Russia's ICBMs. Remember the REAL cold war? It was the presence of mutual destructive power that kept anybody from using it. The U.S. efforts destabilize that and opens the way to real danger of an American first strike if it becomes widespread. 74.227.163.200 03:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Invasion of Georgia, giving arms too Iran and Venezuela. Blocking every single sanctions on Iran. It's clear Putin wants a second cold war. His personal views on the Soviet Union is scary. I can't believe my fellow citizens are ageist the missile shield were protecting our NATO/EU allies. And its clear as day that Russia wants the former Soviet Republics back under her control. (btw I'm the same person on the IP) --KDP3 (talk) 08:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Again you've got a pretty twisted perception. Invasion of Georgia? So to you NATO is also an aggressor since it also used military force to stop genocide? The Balkans are the backyard of the main body of Europe (excluding Russia in this sense), the caicus and neighboring area is the backyard of Russia. Is it just that you don't like that the splitting of an ethnic group and its being ruled by an oppressive genocidal dictator who was actually supported by the U.S. this time was at the receiving end? We've got a lot of work to do to improve and prevent the U.S. from supporting war criminals. 74.227.163.200 15:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Guys why do we need to nuke each other, cant we all just get along? 76.100.25.133 20:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you comparing The South Ossetia war too NATO campaigns to stop the Russian backed Serbs troops from killing around you know 100k People in Bosnia alone? And frankly the only Dictator I can think up in the in area is Czar Putin. And his treatment of the press[1] and Ingush [2]. Now who's the Dictator? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.21.217 (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you already forget Milosevic? Very convenient for you but I can't say I'm very surprised here. Adding on to that, the dicatator currently ruling Georgia Saakashvili did attack the Ossetians, and he tried to time it during the Olympics when Russia was and the rest of the world might have been distracted. You need only look at the actual reports on medical evacuations to see the truth here. 74.227.163.200 21:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

President Saakashvili unlike Putin and his puppet did not need to control the media too win a election. Since his people supported the Rose Revolution. And I agree attacking South Osstia during the Olympics is a bad call. It was asking Russia too come take over us and restart the cold war. But President Bush had warn Sasskashvili not too attack S Ossetia. But why are you ignoring all the good things that came out of Russia?