Comments:Santorum neologism gains prominence during US election cycle

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.

Start a new discussion

Disgusting, vulgar parasites

Disgusting, vulgar parasites. Your day at the scaffolds will soon come. 98.250.168.229 (talk) 13:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Fascinating case study of a comment and yet a bit enlightening when compared with this one. -- Cirt (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Sauce

Sauce 204.11.191.232 (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

How so? -- Cirt (talk) 23:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "Senator Rick Santorum has as a..."

Senator Rick Santorum has as any American the right to speak out his heart, LGBT Constant fear is derived from the practice of constant Evil,they fear that the man will be elected and while in power might limit not their freedoms but their but their libertinage. 68.206.132.16 (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Not sure what "libertinage" means here. -- Cirt (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "I like Santorum. Even though w..."

I like Santorum. Even though we do not agree on this subject, I am voting for him anyway. His vision of America and his character shine above a field of liars on both sides of the political scale. 75.129.104.232 (talk) 02:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your comments. -- Cirt (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Why this article lacks quality

See talk page:

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Santorum_neologism_gains_prominence_during_US_election_cycle#Stevertigo.27s_notes:_Why_this_article_lacks_quality Steverti (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your opinions. :) -- Cirt (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - ""I suspect if something was up..."

"I suspect if something was up there like that about, say, Joe Biden, they would get rid of it..." Click the I'm Feeling Lucky button for a search on Failure and you get GW Bush. Google does not censor or alter their searches; hence Santorum will retain his obtained meaning. 24.58.253.85 (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Great point! Thanks for commenting here. -- Cirt (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)