Comments:Ship sunk by Indian navy was a fishing boat, says owner
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
If they thought it was a pirate mother ship, then it is very very unlikely that the navy was fired upon first. He's probably lying.
At least the Indian Navy Sunk something
[edit]I was suspicious about this story from the get go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.146.111 (talk) 08:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
What a "Fishing Boat" from Thailand was doing in Gulf of Aden?? Definitely its not fishing only if they go around thousands of miles crossing Indian Ocean and going there for fishing. Thai pirates are already known to control Andaman Sea in Indian Ocean. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.73.18.106 (talk) 08:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Thats how dumb Indians are...
[edit]Simply put! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.204.255 (talk) 19:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.241.191 (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)