Comments:Somali pirates seize tanker off coast of Madagascar

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Pirates?1320:18, 27 March 2010

What I can't understand is why don't these zillion dollar ships have 50 cal. machine guns on their decks manned by highly trained marksmen??!! I have no sympathy for the crew, nor the owners.

24.234.47.52 (talk)23:40, 6 March 2010

The new w:TI class supertankers are over 1200 feet long (379m). A 50 cal machine gun isn't super accurate, so assume you'd need one every 300 feet of length. That's 5 gun positions PER side. 10 in total. Say you only have 5 of those positions manned at any given time (You have to see the enemy coming). Now you have to have these people in shifts, lets assume standard 8 hour rotations, so now you're up to 15 "high trained marksmen" (whom BTW wouldn't use a machine gun, marksmans would use rifles). Even well qualified machine gunners aren't cheap. So now you've gone from a crew of about 30 to 45. You've probably also DOUBLED the cost of personnel for each and EVERY trip.

You have no sympathy for people (the crew) who are just trying to make a living like everyone else. People who aren't paid to fight pirates, they are just making decent wages (certainly not overly well paid for what they do). You are a cold, heartless bastard.

ShakataGaNai ^_^00:30, 7 March 2010
 

I'm sure the port authorities and coast guards for the various nations (not to mention the naval coalitions) they pass would be thrilled to deal with making sure that an armed civilian ship is not a pirate or militant vessel.

Fishy c (talk)02:41, 7 March 2010
 
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 22:20, 7 March 2010

The cost of the lives of the crew is alone worth whatever monetary loss incured. Those ships cost multi- millions, that does not include the value of the cargo, even more millions. Now lets think just a little, the pirates will not release the crew or ship for less than a million dollars, how many men and guns could you hire for that amount. Let the pirates know you've got enough fire power and men to blow them out of the water a hunddred yards before they even get near your ship and they will stop. The pirates only attack because they can, kill a bunch of them and they will stop. They are not worried about who they hurt, if we had the same attitude things would change very fast. My mother always said," if someone is nice to you, be nice to them, if someone is bad to you--kill them," mom didn't have many friends, but everyone one who knew her either respected her or was afraid of her. Lesson learned !!!!!!!!

71.165.212.132 (talk)07:44, 7 March 2010
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 20:22, 7 March 2010

For the love of GOD turns off your capslock.

Now for your question, "How many men and guns could you hire for that amount (1 Million Dollars)?". It is actually fairly simple to do the math so lets take a look.

The M2 Browning 50 cal machine gun has a replacement cost of about $15,000 ( according to this ). That is for the US Military though, the civilian market would cost more. Let's assume a decent markup, plus the cost of related hardware (like mounting) that the cost is $25,000. Don't forget that you need something to shoot, lets keep enough ammo for at least 1,000 rounds at each station. The bulk cost for 50 cal is $4 a round. So: 10 Stations * $25,000 (a gun) + (1,000 rnds of ammo * $4 each) = $290,000

Now let's take a look at the men. You want "highly trained marksmen" so lets get some E-7 w:Sergeant First Class's with 22 years of experience. That will cost $4,142.10 a month, or roughly $50,000 a year. Now this is just base salary, any specialties on top of that (like scout sniper) are going to earn them more. Plus the US Army has a lot of benefits. In reality to lure them away from the military, you're going to have to pay them a lot more (after all, they are mercenaries now), lets say $125,000 a year (Though I've heard PMCs in Iraq earn as much as $1,000 a day). Remember, we needed 15 men from the earlier post. So: 15 men * $125,000 a year = $1,875,000

Adding it all up. $290,000 for guns + $1,875,000 for men = $2,165,000. Over 2 MILLION Dollars for one ship, for one year. You can't forget that the men are paid salary, so that cost is just going to keep going up. Plus guns constantly exposed to sea water are going to need constant maintenance and replacement parts. Oh, and the men will need to train too so you'll have to buy more ammo. See where this is going? It isn't cheap to equip a ship with men and guns.

So lets answer your question now, "How many men and guns could you hire for that amount (1 Million Dollars)?". Half of a ship, half of the time.

ShakataGaNai ^_^20:18, 7 March 2010
 

There's always http://www.convertcase.net/ for your capitalization needs.

Mikemoral♪♫22:21, 7 March 2010
 

It's also worth considering what would happen if pirates did manage to take over an armed tanker - which might become the target, itself, because it's not like taking a naval vessel. And being an oil tanker, you can't just sink it if it's taken and starts terrorizing the area.

Fishy c (talk)06:24, 8 March 2010
 

It seems like hiring trained personnel would be a better use of the ship owner's money than outfitting the ship itself. It's a more flexible option, since your defense is still functional even if the ship is boarded. It's expensive, to be sure, but no company wants to lose cargo and the lives of their employees - even if it's only for the sake of maintaining a healthy public image. That being said, the issue shouldn't have to be resolved by private companies. Global entities like the United Nations are supposed to be the ones addressing these issues through united action in defense of their citizens. I'm not saying that to express some form of desperate idealism - it's more an observation of the systemic failure of contemporary government to respect the rights and needs of honest people. I certainly feel that if government isn't willing to step up to solve the problem, they should step aside and let private contractors deal with it instead.

174.3.63.153 (talk)07:10, 8 March 2010

There are 27 navies from around the world engaged in anti-piracy operations in Somali waters, many of which form combined task forces and regularly share intelligence; since this is an "infringement of [Somalia's] sovereignty" they have the permission of the United Nations to carry out these operations. Many countries have also authorized shipping companies to use private security measures, and some security firms specialize in anti-piracy. So you do have government trying to fight piracy, and you do have the private sector trying to fight piracy.

Fishy c (talk)19:21, 8 March 2010
 

They could use that ultra sound system. I forget what its called but the machine sends out a ultra high frequency that is supposed to hurt the ear drum. Why cant they just put a few of those on the boats instead of hiring men?

E1mann48 (talk)17:16, 8 March 2010

Well from what I remember, those aren't public available yet and I think they may have fairly limited range. Sure they might work out to 100 feet or so, but you want to drive away the pirates BEFORE they get in RPG range. Secondarily, even if you were to have those on the boats instead of guns, you'd still need to have multiple units spread around the boat (for full coverage) and you'd need people to operate them. It isn't just simply a matter of having someone at the controlls of these weapons, it is having the people out there to SPOT the pirates in advance and use whatever weapon you have. We're not talking about a fishing trolley that is 20 or 30 feet stem to stern, we're talking about super tankers that are 1200+ feet in length. The world record for the 400m dash (just slightly longer than the boat) is 43 seconds. So it isn't like you can just say "they'll spot them from the controls tower and run out to the forward guns", that would take far far too long.

ShakataGaNai ^_^18:31, 8 March 2010

Piracy................Arghhhhh Matey. Look ahoy there, Mogadishu!

71.161.200.156 (talk)19:43, 27 March 2010
 
 
 

Here's my proposal (I've heard of a ship that was well-prepared doing something similar, though I do claim to have thought of it separately). Ships have something of a 'lip' around them. The rig I heard was simply spoils of barbed wire, but I'd have thought a system of perspex extending several metres all round the ship could be produced relatively cheaply with little maintenance required. Barbed wire (electrified if you're willing to pay for it) would crown the edge. It would be removable fairly quickly by undoing bolts and folding inwards, but that's fairly impracticle for a hijacker. Obviously, that doesn't stop them shooting RPGs at you, but it's better than nothing. The main point is most pirates simply can't be arsed with a ship that's obviously got some level of preparation for them and defences to penetrate, and will move on away from you.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)20:18, 27 March 2010