Comments:Study concludes 9/11 firefighters are 19% more likely to develop cancer
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.
Comments from feedback form - "i really dont care- at least t..."
i really dont care- at least they are alive. they have the best health insurance in america- get over it. 12.111.153.130 (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Get Over It? what the hell is that supposed to mean! get over yourself you selfish ass!!! 99.13.117.143 (talk) 20:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Firefighters are exposed to risks and they knew that when they applied for the job, why the big hoo-ha noise now? 156.8.251.250 (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Google "radioactive mini-nuke fragments" ... China Syndrome at the WTC ... http://www.anonymousphysicist.com/ 67.61.166.93 (talk) 23:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Google "China Syndrome at the WTC"
Everyone needs to learn that 9/11 was the American regime nuking its own largest city, and it created the China Syndrome which then poisoned thousands of responders and millions of NY residents.
http://www.anonymousphysicist.com/ 67.61.166.93 (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)