Comments:Swedish Parliament passes electronic surveillance law

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

mod the link

mould the procession

a disjunct chess match where our true opponent is the square

--kopimi (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


1984 IS NOT AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL! Fephisto (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The arguments against the law are omitted[edit]

I'd say this article is biased. While the arguments for the law are presented, the ones against it are not.

The stated intent of the monitoring is to protect against foreign threats, cyber warfare, and the like. The hundreds who rallied to protest the privacy infringement seemed to have their own ideas.

"...their own ideas" - this article won't be NPOV unless these ideas are explained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.64.76.116 (talk) 09:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold, also, this should probably be under the contributions page. Fephisto (talk) 16:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]