Comments:Turkish Parliament approves military action in Iraq
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
So, the U.S. wants Turkey to do as they say and not as they do? 129.97.62.113 13:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- I believe the point was that it is rather...hypocritical for Bush to, well, basically demand that Turkey do nothing to Iraq in terms of a military "incursion", when he saw it fit to actually invade the country 4 years ago, for the reason that "Iraq has WMDs and will use them against us" (well, as good as), which there was and is no proof for, apparently. --86.143.247.114 21:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC).
Responding to the motion, U.S. President George W. Bush urged Turkey not to carry out an attack,
[edit]saying "[we are] making it clear to Turkey it is not in their interest to send more troops in... there is a better way to deal with the issue."
HA