Comments:Two airliners come within seconds of collision over Indiana, US
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Modernise it?
[edit]What horsecrap. Put more planes in the sky and you need to put more bums on seats in front of screens watching the radar. I know someone works at Edinburgh airport, they modernised the airport to support more traffic. They built a new tower which gives better visibility. But, to my knowledge, they didn't increase the number of controllers. Money doesn't get spent on manpower. That's such a dull thing to budget for when you get a shiny new terminal building, more parking, and 10-20% more planes. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't see how it could of been a near collision if they were obeying TCAS. Even if the ATC made a mistake the situation was under control. The ATC should thank their lucky stars that the aircraft were modern enough to have advanced safety features onboard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.170.125 (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
WHATS NEXT FOR MIDWEST AIRLINES
[edit]MIDWEST AIRLINES SHOULD STICK WITH THEIR SLOGAN "THE BEST CARE IN THE AIR" AT MSP A PILOT WAS TAKEN OFF THE PLANE FOR DRINKING BEFORE FLYING THE PLANE WHATS NEXT NAPPING DURING FLIGHT OPENING TE DOOR AND SMOKING?