Comments:US B-2 stealth bomber crashes in Guam
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Stupid freakin US..... Why don't they spend that $2 billion on something useful, instead of spending it on new ways to kill others <Hoj Ferwerk - (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)>
- Maybe because we've been put in the position of defending the global interests of countries unwilling to defend their own ;). Spacehusky - (talk) 14:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Because altruism is the hallmark of U.S. foreign policy. :p -Etafly - (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Of course, but since the end of the Cold War the U.S. has assumed a very disproportionate share of the burden of representing the interests of the west overseas.
- Because altruism is the hallmark of U.S. foreign policy. :p -Etafly - (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
1.2 to 2 billion dollars could feed 1.2 to 2 million starving, mal-nourished people around the world for a year. And please, i hope no comments spring up about the US 'needing' B-2 stealth bombers. - kjinnra_nemesis
- Countries love to criticize American defense spending but when we ask them to commit forces in our place they fall strangely silent ;) Spacehusky - (talk) 04:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- Wouldn't have anything to do with those people criticising American defence spending on the grounds of them thinking that the militaristic approach to getting things done is wrong, would it? Talkingpie - (talk) 18:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments from feedback form - "Awsome"
[edit]Awsome —142.163.49.90 (talk) 14:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)