Comments:US President Obama announces deal reached to avert government default

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Neutrality the way it should be103:42, 3 August 2011
Not $1 Trillion103:20, 2 August 2011

Neutrality the way it should be

This is my 1st time on Wikinews and this first story that I read was about as neutral as you,possibly,can get.An excellent introduction to Wikinews. Thank you

Thack57 (talk)02:14, 3 August 2011

Thank you for the compliments! We try our best to be neutral ;)

All the best,

Ragettho (talk)03:42, 3 August 2011
 

Not $1 Trillion

Nearly $1 trillion. Actually $917 Billion. But not $917 billion less than this year, $917 Billion less than planned over the next ten fiscal years.

24.118.74.248 (talk)17:19, 1 August 2011

I didn't know there is such a thing as a planned budget for 10 years later. Is the stated amount an estimate of the impact on expenditure of whatever new policies proposed? Funicode (talk) 03:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Funicode (talk)03:20, 2 August 2011