Comments:US Supreme Court rules video games are protected speech

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
At least include the name of the ruling!000:48, 14 December 2017
Comments from feedback form - "Good article and judiciously p..."104:50, 1 July 2011
They did something right?023:18, 29 June 2011

At least include the name of the ruling!

At least include the name of the ruling! That's just about the most important piece of information!

2601:403:0:2C40:DBE:FFD7:FFB7:C259 (talk)00:48, 14 December 2017

Comments from feedback form - "Good article and judiciously p..."

Good article and judiciously pruned for the most important information. I cannot stop giggling at the picture of Scalia, though.

69.31.35.200 (talk)18:56, 30 June 2011

indeed. Scalia looks rather... jovial :P

Ragettho (talk)04:50, 1 July 2011
 

They did something right?

They did something right? Holy heck, Parents should be able to parent their kids, not the government.

Crazynomad (talk)23:18, 29 June 2011