Comments:US Supreme Court rules video games are protected speech
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
At least include the name of the ruling! | 0 | 00:48, 14 December 2017 |
Comments from feedback form - "Good article and judiciously p..." | 1 | 04:50, 1 July 2011 |
They did something right? | 0 | 23:18, 29 June 2011 |
Good article and judiciously pruned for the most important information. I cannot stop giggling at the picture of Scalia, though.
They did something right? Holy heck, Parents should be able to parent their kids, not the government.