The article fails to note what the subject was convicted of, i.e. the specific charge. It mentions his crime, and the sentence, but not the conviction itself.
Comments:US court jails second man for Revolution Muslim web postings
About this board
Not editable
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Previous page history was archived for backup purposes at Comments:US court jails second man for Revolution Muslim web postings/LQT Archive 1 on 2025-11-07.
There are no older topics