Comments:US to reduce nuclear weapons arsenal

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Shot from the blind man216:21, 4 March 2010

Shot from the blind man

While I think that Mr. Obama's philosophy overall is not good for the U.S. I do agree with his intention to drawdown the total number of nuclear weapons. Sort of a basic truth, a blind man will hit, at least, one worthwhile target if he shoots enough bullets.

Guardianstatue (talk)03:52, 3 March 2010

President Obama can talk about reducing America's nuclear arsenal by however many thousands of weapons he wants. I doubt he will be successful for very long, if at all. This is another historic accomplishment he is reaching for; the next one he achieves in the field of governance other than making George Bush look like a sober spender will be the first.

71.61.228.150 (talk)08:45, 3 March 2010
 

I agree with 90% of President Obama's goals. this is one of those goals, as for spending Republicans steal peoples money and give it to fat cats on wall street.

99.13.118.232 (talk)16:21, 4 March 2010