Comments:US unveils revived space exploration program

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Hoorah!105:32, 25 April 2010
economy000:16, 19 April 2010
After policing the World019:27, 18 April 2010
Comments from feedback form - "Headline is subjective, (could..."008:14, 17 April 2010
Comments from feedback form - "While lacking in detail, the p..."020:07, 16 April 2010
Comments from feedback form - "The opposing argument was not ..."218:10, 16 April 2010
Wow!013:48, 16 April 2010
Comments from feedback form - "If only we could go to Mars ri..."104:34, 16 April 2010

This is the best news I have ever heard. I'm glad that the government is pursuing space exploration once again.

75.70.39.189 (talk)04:07, 22 April 2010

Look a little deeper. He was not specific about very much. The Administration was surprised by the push back, so he gave a very charismatic, pretty speech, saying what people wanted to hear, with few concrete promises. Even the "restoration of Orion" is only less than 20% of its original scope. Don't hold your breadth.

98.248.110.251 (talk)05:32, 25 April 2010
 

lol how does it help economy?

96.255.137.55 (talk)00:16, 19 April 2010

After policing the World

They fail to even have the decency to hide their indecent spendings. Space exploration is for the countries like India or China who do produce something more than terrorists, weapons of mass destruction and kitch media and also have an excedentary balance. Hehehe, after all, they are the same ones who do it under the american flag as well.

92.80.61.112 (talk)19:27, 18 April 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Headline is subjective, (could..."

Headline is subjective, (could be interpreted as POV) Perhaps US unveils revised space program would have been a more appropriate word choice.

HaroldWilson'sWar (talk)08:14, 17 April 2010

Comments from feedback form - "While lacking in detail, the p..."

While lacking in detail, the presidents' plan doesn't exactly scrap Constellation or the work done on that program. It refocuses some of it, and will hopefully result in a better, more cost effective plan moving forward.

209.19.58.51 (talk)20:07, 16 April 2010

Comments from feedback form - "The opposing argument was not ..."

The opposing argument was not represented in a credible way, but the article did reliably accomplish its goal as a press release for the POTUS. An accurately represented counterargument would be that the President not only had ended human spaceflight at NASA indefinitely with the cancellation of the Constellation program, resulting in an inevitable knowledge vacuum surrounding the piloting of spacecraft within NASA but also wasted billions of dollars in penalties by the cancellation of those contracts and furthermore the outsourcing of piloting human spacecraft to foreign nations.

206.53.153.175 (talk)04:43, 16 April 2010

If you had taken the time to read the article, you would have seen that the Constellation Program was retained, at least in a large part. The Orion capsule is to have development continued; hell, Obama even made provision for a new rocket instead of the Ares launchers. There's really no longer any downside to his plans, other than the shuttle retiring, which is, no doubt, why no-one's come up with a significant counter-argument.

C628 (talk)10:40, 16 April 2010

While The space shuttle clearly needed to be retired (and replaced with a robust multi-stage rocket system), Outsourcing human spaceflight to private venture capitalists seems an unpromising and frankly dangerous option for the American Space Program. Granted, I would've expected a move like this from the Republicans, but to see it coming from Obama is disheartening indeed. Also the "Propulsion Breakthrough" that Obama seems to be investing his hopes in, seems more science fiction that reality. Despite massive improvements in precision and efficiency, Basic propulsion technology has scarcely improved since the 1960's. Perhaps this is yet another case of the "faith in the magic bullet of technology" that all too many leaders seem to believe will end the worlds problems, whether it be with Climate change, Peak oil, or our ability to explore space.

HaroldWilson'sWar (talk)16:09, 16 April 2010
 
 

To describe the killing off of the space program as "revived space exploration" is just swallowing Obama's rhetoric wholesale. For shame! --65.51.209.126 (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

65.51.209.126 (talk)13:48, 16 April 2010

Comments from feedback form - "If only we could go to Mars ri..."

If only we could go to Mars right now...

Benny the mascot (talk)02:15, 16 April 2010

Of course Obama wants to go to Mars. It's the only red planet out there.

206.74.5.136 (talk)04:34, 16 April 2010