Comments:Vietnam bans pet hamsters
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
That's a bit much for such a small rodent...
To be honest, i think that the health problem with disease and illness carried with the hamsters is a problem, but have to pay that amount of money for a rodent is pathetic!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
This is what happens when Communism meets the cute. No, they couldn't just limit hamster imports, or increase their prices like they can so easily do in their damned planned economy. They have to order that all sale or posession of hamsters is illegal. Disease spreaders? I don't buy that for two seconds. Almost all of those hamsters are domestic, and making them illegal won't stop the feral population, if there is one. I think this is probably just another instance of Communist tyrants exerting their power and destroying something which gave people pleasure but didn't have a practical purpose. Kvn8907 - (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Imagine being said kid who owns a hamster. You don't want to get in trouble. And you probably don't want to kill a beloved pet. The logical solution is to hide the thing (it's small and concealable) and dump it somewhere. If they were worried about a feral population, even if there wasn't one before, there's certainly going to be one now! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 01:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
That's True, Kvn8907 and Unsigned (last) and the other one that wants to "destroy hamsters", it maybe has to decide it the people, or image that you were exiled, that's not fair, it's cruelty--22.214.171.124 20:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)