Comments:Virgin Atlantic jet fire investigation finds faulty wiring in A340 fleet

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

Another type

Interesting, but too much paragraphs. This 'accident' is, in my opinion, too old. As it happened, i'd read this with surprise and today create a 2nd article to this topic.
The language is clearly and perspicuous, so it's easy to read.
The heading is maybe too long, but with my English skill, I haven't got something shorter.

--Kai Burghardt (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The article is not about the accident itself, but rather what the investigation has revealed. Almost everything there is new information from the report on Friday. In particular, there is the issues with wiring accross the fleet. I'm glad you found the article interesting and easily readable, though. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 22:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

I think that this article should have more into it. it doesn't have enough detail--122.163.85.173 (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)