Comments:Wikipedia and sister projects prepare new, easier interface

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Reads like it's trying to sell the skin

Wikinews discovers a factual error in the article.

Wikipedia still hasn't used Vector as the default!

Commons is april 5, wikipedia is end of april.

So the article is wrong :(

yeah, which is kind of sad considering its essentially about us. Should we put a correction note? (announcement was http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2010/03/the-change-in-interface-is-coming/ )

No. It ain't our fault they can't get their shit together.

We probably should. What is it? {{correction}}?

hmmm...well it seems that the sources were properly summarized. See [1]. I'm not exactly sure what to do when the sources themselves turn out to be wrong after the fact

Tell the source they failed and correct ourselves?

It took me long enough to get us to our change - thus it would be good to see 'pedia finally catching up :P

I still prefer WikED to edit with. Although, Vector is an awesome skin. Goodbye Monobook, hello Vector.

"in addition to editing an article while watching it" — Don't we already have the capability to watch pages in the editing box? All you have to do is click the check box for "Watch this page"