Talk:Brazilian soccer player's mother has been kidnapped/Review

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This article has been submitted for review by the Wikinews community. The review period is currently a minimum of 8 hours for regular articles and 4 hours for urgent stories. An article needs to find consensus - no objections - in the following categories in order to be accepted for publication. See also Wikinews:Article stages#Review for information on what constitutes a valid objection.

Is the article neutral?[edit]

All factual claims need to be attributed or sourced. On-topic information which is relevant to the article should be added. Off-topic information should NOT be added to "balance out" an article.

No issues I can see.--Eloquence 03:28, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • It's fine Lyellin 03:31, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Is the article accurate and have sources been cited?[edit]

All facts should be verifiable. Factual claims which are attributed to a person or group, but considered false by another person or group can remain in the article as long as the controversy is accurately represented.

No issues I can see.--Eloquence 03:28, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Also fine Lyellin 03:31, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Is the article legal?[edit]

Does the article violate any laws of the state of Florida in the United States? Specifically, does it violate other people's copyright, in text or images? Please make sure that no images have been directly copied from a non-free source without permission, and that any brief text quoted from a non-free source is attributed accurately. Use Google News and Google Search and pick individual phrases from the article to verify this.

No issues I can see.--Eloquence 03:28, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Also fine Lyellin 03:31, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Does the article comply with our policies and guidelines?[edit]

Aside from the above categories, does the article comply with Wikinews:Content guide and Wikinews:Style guide?'

No issues I can see. Sources at the bottom might be expanded a bit.--Eloquence 03:28, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Seems to be fine. Lyellin 03:31, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Is the article comprehensive?[edit]

Relevant information on the topic should be included, while keeping in mind timeliness. Given that an almost infinite amount can be said about any topic, objections in this category carry less weight than those in other categories.

A bit on the short side, a bit out of date.--Eloquence 03:28, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • I think I agree with Eloquence, but given how new the project is, the time issue is fine. Lyellin 03:31, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)


The grammar must be checked. I think that my English can be improved here. --carlosar.Nov 15 17:52:28 UTC 2004

I corrected some grammar and removed the bit about Robson's goals, since I don't really see how this is relevant to the kidnapping of his mother... Foeke 17:58, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thank you for your colaboration. I think the information about the goals is important because we can't assume the reader knows the player. I think something must be said about the player and the team, and how the player is important to team. I think it is important saying about Real Madrid interest because that says how relevant is the information at the world sport scenario. Maybe should I put some information about Robinho in Wikipedia. I am waiting another comments.--carlosar Nov 15 18:08:37 UTC 2004

It is ok saying Little Robin but you must say Robinho too, because the player is known around the world by the name Robinho.--carlosar Nov 15 18:08:37 UTC 2004

Since the incident, Robson De Souza ('Robinho') has not appeared in public. >> I think this is not exactly a correct information. What I am sure(and I can prove) is that Robinho is not playing anymore. --carlosar Nov 15 18:08:37 UTC 2004

What is the best way to say Robinho is not playing for Santos since the incident? Or: is it really correct saying:Since the incident, Robson De Souza ('Robinho') has not appeared in public.?.--carlosar Nov 15 18:12:37 UTC 2004

I changed it to "has made few public appearances", which seems to be more accurate.--Eloquence