Talk:Jose Maria Aznar wants NATO to take in Australia and Israel

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nato is always under US military control[edit]

Amazing how few people know that. Neutralizer 14:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

This notice is a friendly reminder that talk pages are to be used for discussion of the development of the article, and are not areas to express your own personal opinion on matters. Thank you. --MrMiscellaniousHappy Hanukkah – 17:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
No, MrM, This is a wiki;censorship is unwelcome on the talk pages.

However, I would like to see some reference in the article to the fact that Nato is under US control. Ok, I have found this to expand the article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SACEUR Neutralizer 21:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, Criticisim of NATO and the UN is a double edge thing. Nato is militarily controlled by the US and UK, so Aznar criticism seems to be directed to France, Belgium, Spain and Germany for their refusals to participate in Iraq. Similar situation happens with the UN, that has been criticised by the US who labels the UN useless; however the US has the longest record of vetoing the US resolutions proposed by th rest of the world. So when you criticise these two organisms, who you are criticising really?--Tequendamia 06:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)