Talk:Palestinians to elect new president on January 9/Review

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This article has been submitted for review by the Wikinews community. The review period is currently a minimum of 8 hours for regular articles and 4 hours for urgent stories. An article needs to find consensus - no objections - in the following categories in order to be accepted for publication. See also Wikinews:Article stages#Review for information on what constitutes a valid objection.

Is the article neutral?[edit]

All factual claims need to be attributed or sourced. On-topic information which is relevant to the article should be added. Off-topic information should NOT be added to "balance out" an article.

Looks good.--Eloquence 03:07, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) Seems to be. --Lyellin 20:44, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Is the article accurate and have sources been cited?[edit]

All facts should be verifiable. Factual claims which are attributed to a person or group, but considered false by another person or group can remain in the article as long as the controversy is accurately represented.

Looks good, checked against the cited sources.--Eloquence 03:07, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) I can't find anything wrong. --Lyellin 20:44, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Is the article legal?[edit]

Does the article violate any laws of the state of Florida in the United States? Specifically, does it violate other people's copyright, in text or images? Please make sure that no amount of text or images has been directly copied from a non-free source without permission. Use Google News and Google Search and pick individual phrases from the article to verify this.

Looks good, checked against Google News.--Eloquence 03:07, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) Nothing wrong. --Lyellin 20:44, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Does the article comply with our policies and guidelines?[edit]

Aside from the above categories, does the article comply with Wikinews:Content guide and Wikinews:Style guide?'

Looks good.--Eloquence 03:07, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) Yep. -- Lyellin 20:44, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)


Is the article comprehensive?[edit]

Relevant information on the topic should be included, while keeping in mind timeliness. Given that an almost infinite amount can be said about any topic, objections in this category carry less weight than those in other categories.

Some more background could help, but OK for publication.--Eloquence 03:07, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I think it is not a big trouble, but I would like to suggest someone put the photo credits of Image:Mahmoud abbas.jpg, unless it is unknown. carlosar--Nov 15 12:14:25 UTC 2004.

Agree with Eloquence, but I don't think the article is hurt due to lack. --Lyellin 20:44, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)