Talk:Senator David Vitter to earmark $100,000 for creationist group

POV

Firstly, is this really an important story?

Secondly, if you can't see the bias in this you really need to get your head examined.

I suggest we just delete this.

--206.116.168.12 08:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

What is missing is the Senator's side of the story. Did he make any statement to go with the earmarking of these funds or was it just a line item in a budget? --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

206.116.168.12, many blogs are writing about this as well as many science groups. If its bias against creationism, that's because science is consider creationism pseudoscience. Part of Vitter's statement. Shown2233361 15:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

A senator giving tax payer money to a group who pushes a religious agenda on public schools is noteworthy. That is, afterall, why there is press coverage/sources on this page. What is exactly is the "bias" you dispute? C56C 16:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I'd say that putting the word "combat" in quotes is showing a bias. Wikisoup 19:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Its the word used on LFF's website, which is why its in quotes. C56C 20:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)