Talk:Speculation arises as North Korean media drops Kim Jong Il's title

This article has been submitted for review by the Wikinews community. The review period is currently a minimum of 8 hours for regular articles and 4 hours for urgent stories. An article needs to find consensus - no objections - in the following categories in order to be accepted for publication. If the review period elapses without comments, the article may be published. See also Wikinews:Article stages#Review for information on what constitutes a valid objection.

Please comment on any of the following issues:

Neutrality: All factual claims need to be attributed or sourced. On-topic information which is relevant to the article should be added. Off-topic information should NOT be added to "balance out" an article.
Accuracy: All facts should be verifiable. Factual claims which are attributed to a person or group, but considered false by another person or group can remain in the article as long as the controversy is accurately represented.
Legality: Does the article violate any laws of the state of Florida in the United States? Specifically, does it violate other people's copyright, in text or images? Please make sure that no images have been directly copied from a non-free source without permission, and that any brief text quoted from a non-free source is attributed accurately. Use Google News and Google Search and pick individual phrases from the article to verify this.
Writing: Is it well-written and understandable?
Policies: Does the article comply with Wikinews:Content guide and Wikinews:Style guide?
Comprehensiveness: Relevant information on the topic should be included, while keeping in mind timeliness. Given that an almost infinite amount can be said about any topic, objections in this category carry less weight than those in other categories.

Comments

Add your comments below.

Needs the location in the intro, per the style guide. Also needs a slight copyedit, as there's some awkward wording. It's almost there, however. Ambi 13:04, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I have reviewed Japanese media coverages on this issue (not the Radiopress, though, since it seems to maintain no web site). Two things I noticed regarding facts:

Some reports say that the removal of the portraits is not a new thing, but ordered in August.
Tass reported lately that the honorific title reappeared in the paper.

One thing about neutrality:

Explaining North Korea as one of stalinist states as a part of a news report sounds like this news story is from a bit opinionated source. Not that it is factually wrong. Am I alone here?

Tomos 05:36, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

- Not at all..."Stalinist" merely means "in the manner of Stalin". Any emotional connotation is purely a construction of the reader; it's not inherent to the word. Kurt Weber 06:06, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)