Talk:Wal-Mart cuts ties with PR consultant over controversial Republican TV ad

This guy isn't a Walmart employee, the title is plain wrong. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 15:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

The title is changed. Can we publish? FellowWikiNews (W) 18:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

• That's not up to me, but to the community. However, the employee implication (terms like fired) is still present in the article. I was sure I'd tagged this over the issue last night - I guess I got a preview unsaved or something like that. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 19:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I've removed the employee-implying text and published, I suspect this was just someone who didn't realise you can do a job for someone when you're not employed directly. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 19:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Brian. I didn't notice the employee-implying text until you pointed it out on this page :) FellowWikiNews (W) 20:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)