Excellent photo use!
Just wanted to take a moment to say you have an excellent photo use and caption on Cypriot plane with 121 on board crashes in Greece. First one I've come across tonight which properly credited the photographer. I checked over the photo, and it appears to have been taken for Helios, so I'm tagging it as a publicity photo. Again, thanks! - Amgine / talk 01:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Do you want to merge: http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Bush_nominates_Alito_to_Supreme_Court
If so, feel free to use what you want if you have time. Or I can add the info. Your decision.
--Psusen 11:57, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Wasn't around, sorry. Thanks for all the work on the article. --Deprifry|+T+ 16:53, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello,Your response to the Neutralizer (plus all the vandal and spam fighting you do) makes it appear you would make a very good admin. Will you accept a nomination for adminship? --Cspurrier 22:41, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Great job on this! really appreciate what you're doing... - Amgine 21:00, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the warm welcome! I have mainly been a 'Pedia contributor, but that might now change :) Cya around! Brisvegas 08:07, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Now an Admin
Congratulations you are now an admin. If you have any questions about the admin tools please let me know --Cspurrier 17:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Congrats on your new super-awseome ADMIN powers (:. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
heres an idea for positioning. how does it look — French unions march in support of public services/photo test Bawolff ☺☻ 22:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
wikipedia news sticks for a long time; it's not like a newspaper that becomes fishwrap in a few hours. and the pov of the writer is not relevant to the story. saying "yesterday" is no better than saying "last week". it merely reveals the delay between the event and the writer's encounter with the information, plus his/her decision to post it. so it makes sense to speak of "today" rather than "yesterday" in articles here, always, unless there is intervening information that applies to "today" that makes "yesterday" a relevant distinction. users in the future who read that article will be bemused at the quaintness of the double time-shift they suffer otherwise. which is why i fixed it.
reverting it wasn't necessary in any case. you're dunning boldness.
oh, and could you unlock my IP-named user page? I know all that stuff.
184.108.40.206 22:31, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- Regarding the first point. Wikinews articles carry the date of the day they were published. This was November 22 in the case, the day before that the article didn't even exist. Secondly, I'm not sure what you're talking about "unlocking" you user page. I have not protected the page, you can freely edit there. --Deprifry|+T+ 09:37, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks (from 220.127.116.11)
Heh, forgot I didn't have a registered account over here. Thanks for the welcome, though. :) --Syrthiss 12:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)