Due to lesser activity on Wikinews, I use the permanent archive method for my talk page. I know that many users, even experience ones are unaware of this method. See the archive process on English Wikipedia to know what this permanent link archiving method is. My talk page is archived every month.
I created the above; the title is better, so would you consider moving your content over to this page? You can write it all, the title just conforms more to the Style guide I think. Thanks, —fetch·comms 17:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
It might not be you, but in the history of this article (and on another page) you seem to have exposed your IP by mistake. Am I right - and if so, do you want me to hide your IP for you? Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 11:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- What I mean is, as an admin I have the power to remove the IP (or username) from the page history. In this case, it is useful because IPs are generally considered private information. In your case, it appears you have a dynamic IP, which means it changes regularly and probably won't be a problem, but I'm still happy to hide it if you want. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 13:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'm going to leave my computer again for a little while. That article will be tought to review. Have you been in the Wikinews IRC channel before? You could ask people there to review. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 13:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
RE: 1 killed and 9 injured in a militants attack in Jammu and Kashmir
I see that you tagged the article as undergoing a current edit, that's why I looked over it for review - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 09:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- No problems, shall review now - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 10:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Can you please use the normal source template? The one you usually use is pretty odd for Wikinews and when I edit your articles can be a little annoying as it is not compatible with sources I'd like to add (like while merging the flash floods India article). Thanks, --Shankarnikhil88 (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Look. The template that most people use for sources is this-
|title=Manmohan Singh becomes third longest serving PM
|pub=Times of India
|date=August 12, 2010}}
However, you seem to use this one-
|title = Manmohan Singh becomes third longest serving PM
|author = Indrani Bagchi
|date = August 12, 2010
|pub = Times of India
|url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Manmohan-Singh-becomes-third-longest-serving-PM/articleshow/6294800.cms
Anyway, when I try to add new sources to your articles or when I merge your articles into another article (like the flash floods) your different source template can be tedious to use.
--Shankarnikhil88 (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Eh... That's exactly the same template, just formatted another way. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I've had to tag Pakistan warned to stop press intimidation as single source. I've left a comment on the article's talk page about this; I'm sure you'll agree once you read that and carefully review the sources. I'm sorry it has taken so long for this to be noticed. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
You might want to take a look at this category, considering the article you just subbed; we've even got an FA in there. --Brian McNeil / talk 17:16, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Although I suggested in my review that the story might not rise to the current threshold of "newsworthiness", my question in the review was not rhetorical. --Pi zero (talk) 14:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Nice articles! Both reviewed and published. :-) There's a review comment on the Phobos-Grunt article; and, of course, there's the detailed history of edits during review for each article. --Pi zero (talk) 19:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Published. Review comments on article talk; detailed history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Found not ready on review; see article talk. --Pi zero (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- Through a complicated series of events, it ended up published in a collection of shorts; I've explained in more detail at the article talk. --Pi zero (talk) 13:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
India and China to develop friendly relations
Just about "India and China to develop friendly relations".
First of all, I would like to tell you that the article is really great.
Just about the following sentence "The two sides see the agreement as an important step in gaining trust and strengthening each other."
What is the "object " of "strengthening"? Both states themselves? The trust one state should have in the other? Or what else?
Thanks a lot in advance!
184.108.40.206 (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Do you want to rework your copy on the MidEast situation based on Cold War being a proper noun? I've not looked at sources to see if they are labelling it as such, or if William Vague is doing so. However, there is no such thing as "a cold war"; it's The Cold War — the term coined to describe the Soviet-USA standoff with nukes. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)