User talk:Syedatif
Add topicWelcome
[edit]|
Welcome to Wikinews!
|
Getting a head start as a Wikinews contributor
Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have a short essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. As you get more involved you will want to look into the key policies for the project and other discussions you can participate in, so keep this message on your collaboration page and refer to the other links in it if you have problems or want to learn more. |
|
|
|
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.
Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly. |
The core policies
|
|
|
|
Places to go, people to meet
Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project. |
Where you can help and get involved
|
|
|
DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 19:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
The article is an editorial, not a news article. It is an opinion piece. Wikinews doesn't do opinion pieces or editorials. As one of many examples of this type of thing in the article, look at the following:
We ask you, is it a crime to speak out for truth? is it a crime to demand what you payed for? is it a crime to stand up and let others know what is being done wrong in the college?
That isn't simply stating facts, that is forcing an opinion on the readers. That isn't allowed. Gopher65talk 17:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Your comments
[edit]I happened to come across the notes you left in various places, and while they weren't directed at me, I want to try and answer your concerns nonetheless. Basically, well Wikinews is a news site, that doesn't mean its for all types of news. We aim to be both objective and neutral. The article you wrote, in my mind best fits into the category of editorial. The article basically complains about the quality of a collage in the UAE, and suggests it should be changed. Well it might be true that the collage is of inferror quality, and it may also be true that attention should be drawn to the situation, Wikinews is not the place for doing that. Wikinews aims to be a website for objective and neutral news. Unfortunatly your article is neither. Please keep in mind I'm not making any judgements about the quality or notability of the contents of the article, All I am saying is it is outside of the scope of our project.
Wikinews articles should present the facts, and only the facts. They should not endorse any opinion on the facts. We want the reader to read the facts, and come to their own conclusion. For example in the last paragraph of your article you say "For this, we need the college authorities to take stuff seriously and to listen to all the students with dedication" This is essentially the opposite of what a wikinews article should be. Its telling the reader what to think .As I said previously, these types of articles are important to the world, but Wikinews is not the place for them. Remember as far as wikinews is concerned, there is no Truth to a situation, only stuff that happened. We report on what happened (A roof collapsed, so and so said this, etc), and let the reader determine any truth to a situation. Hopefully that helped answer your questions. Bawolff ☺☻ 07:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)