User talk:Vilalva

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Vilalva, welcome to Wikinews! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Our key policies - if you read anything, read these!

Here are some pointers to help you get to know Wikinews:

There are always things to do on Wikinews:

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, you can ask them at the water cooler or to anyone on the Welcommittee, or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!--MarkTalk to me 01:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your warm comments; I can see that we both feel that we've been responded to similarly—and while I personally think that the article you wrote fails to attest to its own relevance (from reading it, I was not stricken by its significance, but that is true of some other articles which are retained here), I do think that the responses you received may have been misleading or inappropriate, and certainly it was inappropriate for him to attempt to delete your article without having responded to your concerns. Jade Knight (talk) 08:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing for keep votes[edit]

Please do not canvass for votes in a deletion discussion, as you did here at the talk page of Jade Knight (talk · contribs). Thank you, Cirt (talk) 09:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just please do not do it again. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 22:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Note: the followup of the discussion of this issue raised by review editor Cirt is available at this wnlink. --Vilalva (talk) 14:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyvio to pages on this site, as you did and was removed here. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 10:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I have previously stated here, I am pretty convinced that this author's sublime poetry, already deceased, that I have inadvertedly copied to the above mentioned collaboration page, is released in w:public domain. Not being totally sure, perhaps the w:Rosicrucian Fellowship may clarify this ownership issue unto us. --Vilalva (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. Cirt (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]