Wikinews:Admin action alerts
Alerts | Requests |
Requesting a block? Wikinews:Blocking policy states that administrators may block users who "excessively and consistently break site policy. Admins should only do this as a last resort - efforts to educate must be made first, followed by warnings." Admins can not and will not block unless this policy is followed. Please do not raise an alert here unless efforts to educate the user have been made, and warnings have been given. If you have an ongoing problem with another user, you should consider Wikinews:Dispute resolution. |
|
Vandalism from IP:199.212.250.163[edit]
199.212.250.163 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) The IP is reverting/removing speedy deletion requests of copyvio created by Burnsboyamazing (currently blocked locked globally).[1], [2], [3] Warning placed. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 16:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC); edited 13:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- IP:199.212.250.163 has now created two pages that are out of scope.[4], [5]. The account has again been warned.[6] Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 17:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC); edited 17:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- IP:2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9 creating a new, out-of-scope page.[7] Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 01:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- IP:199.212.250.163 has now created two pages that are out of scope.[4], [5]. The account has again been warned.[6] Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 17:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC); edited 17:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Bddpaux I think the following IP accounts are all the same individual performing the same, slow-drip abuse.
- 199.212.250.163 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) [8]
- 2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) [9]
- 2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:FE63:869E:B0E6:EAB8 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) [10]
- 2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:D57E:5A2E:FA7A:B3C6 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) [11] (blocked for 72 hours)
- All accounts are performing similar edits: nonsensical content, irrelevant sources, and spamming talk pages with similarly nonsensical content after making edits. You've blocked one. I think you should block them all from anonymous posting and lets quit playing whack-a-mole. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 15:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- You're most probably right.--Bddpaux (talk) 18:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- 199.212.250.163 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) [12]
- Unblocked request automatically by Bddpaux and Michael.C.Wright.--2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:799:28CC:56E3:DF38 (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- More nonsensical content followed by a renewed request for review.[13]. Both en.wt and en.wp have blocked the entire 199.212.250.0/24 range, which is a school.[14], [15] Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 01:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Created nonsensical category[16] then removed legitimate deletion request.[17] Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 19:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Vandalism from IP:2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9[edit]
2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
This IP account resubmitted a review request without addressing existing issues.[18] Note, this IP is sourced from the same Canadian town as 199.212.250.163 and is continuing the same behavior: removing valid deletion requests[19] and posting nearly-nonsensical content and responses.
I have previously posted alerts regarding IP:199.212.250.163.
Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 19:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Additional vandalism from IP:2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9. This time again submitting an article for review after adding nonsensical text and a source that is off-topic from the headline.[20] Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 20:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've submitted a Checkuser request for all three accounts. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 20:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- (note) IP:2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9 globally blocked. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 02:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- The range block expired yesterday and the abuse resumed immediately.[21], [22], [23] Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 14:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- (note) IP:2607:FEA8:1F1D:8400:E16F:1BC:E317:D8D9 globally blocked. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 02:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've submitted a Checkuser request for all three accounts. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 20:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Oofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:30 User account Gloofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:29 User account Loofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:28 User account Cloofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:27 User account Groofus the Dragon talk[edit]
Oofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:30 User account Gloofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:29 User account Loofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:28 User account Cloofus the Dragon talk contribs was created User creation log 02:27 User account Groofus the Dragon talk Vandalism only accounts. Thank you --BigKrow (talk) 02:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- All locked. MathXplore (talk) 07:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
41.121.86.204[edit]
Keeps adding nonsense to a speedy deleted talk page, thank you. BigKrow (talk) 14:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Globally blocked. MathXplore (talk) 07:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
User:I dont know if im sean 2[edit]
There userpage has derogatory language on it and they are blocked.... anyone want to see if the page can be taken down? Thanks BigKrow (talk) 06:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Already locked. MathXplore (talk) 07:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The User page is still visible though.... BigKrow (talk) 07:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC) Thanks for putting up for deletion. BigKrow (talk) 07:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Please block 2601:206::/32[edit]
Nothing but vandalism, 1 /64 range already blocked Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
IP:107.122.189.11 can't block IP:199.212.250.163 in Special:AbuseFilter/36 (Recent not news article)[edit]
IP:107.122.189.11 can't block IP:199.212.250.163 in Special:AbuseFilter/36 (Recent not news article) because of IP addresses but not user accounts. I think the block would be helpful in user accounts in the same Special:AbuseFilter/36 (Recent not news article) page. 199.212.250.163 (talk) 16:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- May I ask what in the world that is supposed to mean?Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Global lock User:Berima Achaempong TV[edit]
Promotion and spam. 199.212.250.163 (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- User does not exist, locally or globally. Also, administrator cannot globally lock accounts, only stewards can. Requests for that belong at steward requests on metawiki.Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Please block 199.212.250.163 already[edit]
Nonsense, spamming 5 different users and related talk page whenever they do even the most minor things, refusal to get the point, been blocked for it before, don't seem to understand that this is a news site or english very well. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. There is are two threads above documenting the disruption, which is sourced from two different IP ranges.[24], [25] Some of the more recent edits have been constructive. But I still agree a long-term block of anonymous access from two IP ranges would greatly help. Constructive users can always register a username to contribute. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 14:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is it possible to ban them just from talk and user talk namespaces? That would probably be best if possible@Michael.C.Wright:Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Please block 2607:FEA8::/32 too[edit]
Per above Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Consider local block for 173.76.102.69[edit]
173.76.102.69 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
The IP account is currently globally blocked for cross-wiki abuse, including at en.Wikinews.[26] Given the history of abuse here, a local, long-term, anon-only block might be beneficial. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 16:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)