Church of Scientology denied injunction against Anonymous

Thursday, March 13, 2008

The Church of Scientology's second petition for an injunction against online protest group Anonymous was denied by Judge Douglas Baird of Pinellas County, Florida. The first petition, filed Tuesday, against Anonymous was denied yesterday by Judge Linda Allan. The injunction sought to prevent members of Anonymous from coming within 500 feet of Church of Scientology buildings. At time of publishing, the Church has not responded to a request for comment.

The ruling reads:

“

This Petition has been filed against twenty-six individuals alleged to be associating as a group referred to as 'Anonymous'. The Petition contained no specific allegations of wrongdoing against the individuals named as Respondents, nor is it alleged that any of the said named Respondents are responsible for any threats, phone-calls, or specific wrongful acts sought to be enjoined. The Petition fails to allege that any of the Respondents have interfered with or have attempted to deprive the Petitioners of any cognizable right. Further, the Court finds that the Petitioner's certification of notice is insufficient to justify the issuance of an injunction without notice to the Respondents.

”

Member of Anonymous' response

((Wikinews)) The last protest was peaceful, do you expect the 15th to be the same?

Member of Anonymous: Absolutely. There's no reason to believe the success of the 10 February protest won't carry over to this weekend's.

((WN)) Do you believe the threats the Church mentioned in the injunction filing came from members of Anonymous?

Anon: No. They have a history of fabricating these things, and I have no reason to believe this is any different a situation.

((WN)) How have Anonymous defended themselves in court?

Anon: Well, there's been no need for any kind of defense. The restraining order has been rejected by every judge the church has brought it before and furthermore, there's no reason to believe any of the names on their court filing even consider themselves Anonymous. They appear to be completely made-up by the Church of Scientology.

((WN)) Do you view this as an attempt by the Church to stop peaceful protest against them?

Anon: Absolutely. They've used the courts to stop free speech before, they're doing it again. Public protest draws attention to the Church's human rights abuses, so they'll do anything to stop them.

Have an opinion on this story? Share it!

Related news

"Wikinews international report: "Anonymous" holds anti-Scientology protests worldwide" — Wikinews, February 10, 2008
"100 turn out in Orlando, Florida for "Anonymous" protest against Church of Scientology" — Wikinews, February 4, 2008
"Church of Scientology: '"Anonymous' will be stopped"" — Wikinews, February 4, 2008
""Anonymous" plans to protest Church of Scientology on February 10" — Wikinews, January 29, 2008

Sources

This exclusive interview features first-hand journalism by a Wikinews reporter. See the collaboration page for more details.

Learn more about Scientology and the Internet and Project Chanology on Wikipedia.

"Scientologists seek restraining order" — News.com.au, March 13, 2008
The Associated Press. "Judge declines Scientologists' request for restraining order" — The Bradenton Herald, March 13, 2008
Robert Farley. "Second Scientology suit rejected" — St. Petersburg Times, March 13, 2008
Robert Farley. "Judge denies petition by Scientologists to limit protest: The church filed a suit for an "injunction for protection" from a group called Anonymous" — St. Petersburg Times, March 13, 2008
Stephen Thompson. "Judge Denies Scientologists' Bid To Block Protesters" — The Tampa Tribune, March 13, 2008
Sixth Judicial Circuit. "Order denying motion for temporary injunction" — Pinellas County, Florida, March 13, 2008
Neel Shah. ""Anonymous" to Wish L. Ron Hubbard a Very Happy Birthday" — Radar Magazine, March 12, 2008
Tampa Bay's 10 News. "Scientology files petition against Internet group" — WTSP-TV, March 12, 2008
Stephen Thompson. "Church Of Scientology's Bid To Block Protesters Fails" — The Tampa Tribune, March 12, 2008
Robert Farley. "Scientology fights back in court: The church is seeking a restraining order to stop a new round of protests" — St. Petersburg Times, March 12, 2008
Robert Farley. "Scientology accuses protesters of threats" — St. Petersburg Times, March 12, 2008
Robert Farley. "Judge denies petition by Scientologists to limit protest" — St. Petersburg Times, March 12, 2008
Tony Ortega. "What to Get L. Ron Hubbard for His Birthday: How “Anonymous” has changed the game of exposing Scientology's ruthless global scam" — The Village Voice, March 11, 2008

Share this:

This page is archived, and is no longer publicly editable.

Articles presented on Wikinews reflect the specific time at which they were written and published, and do not attempt to encompass events or knowledge which occur or become known after their publication.

Got a correction? Add the template {{editprotected}} to the talk page along with your corrections, and it will be brought to the attention of the administrators.

Please note that due to our archival policy, we will not alter or update the content of articles that are archived, but will only accept requests to make grammatical and formatting corrections.

Note that some listed sources or external links may no longer be available online due to age.

This page is archived, and is no longer publicly editable.

Articles presented on Wikinews reflect the specific time at which they were written and published, and do not attempt to encompass events or knowledge which occur or become known after their publication.

Got a correction? Add the template {{editprotected}} to the talk page along with your corrections, and it will be brought to the attention of the administrators.

Please note that due to our archival policy, we will not alter or update the content of articles that are archived, but will only accept requests to make grammatical and formatting corrections.

Note that some listed sources or external links may no longer be available online due to age.