Wikinews:Admin action alerts

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!

Jump to:navigation, search

Requesting a block for a violation of policy? Wikinews:Blocking policy states that administrators may block users who "excessively and consistently break site policy. Admins should only do this as a last resort - efforts to educate must be made first, followed by warnings." Admins can not and will not block unless this policy is followed. Please do not raise an alert here unless efforts to educate the user have been made, and warnings have been given. If you have an ongoing problem with another user, you should consider Wikinews:Dispute resolution.


[edit] Pages requested for speedy deletion

There are no articles for this topic.

Refresh

Contents


[edit] Archives

[edit] Edits to protected pages

To request an edit to a protected page, add the {{editprotected}} template to the talk page, with an explanation of what edit needs to be made.


[edit] Unblock requests

If you are a blocked user add {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page to request to be unblocked. Your plea will then be highlighted here automatically. These are the current requests:

There are no articles for this topic.

[edit] Archive requests

Use this section to list pages which should be protected for archival reasons.

Please see pages which can be archived, listed at WN:TOARCHIVE. Special requests for protection/archival can be listed below.

[edit] 3RR Violations

Please list 3RR Violations in the following format:

== Username ==
'''Original Version''': <Original Version>
*<first revert diff>
*<second revert diff>
*<third revert diff>
*<fourth revert diff>
--~~~~

You may list incomplete violations by saying "not yet" for the fourth or third diffs, but incomplete violations must be deleted after 24 hours from the first diff. Administrators applying a block for a 3RR violation should note that the first block is up to 24 hours.

[edit] Deletions on Commons

Wikinews:CommonsTicker is now active again.

[edit] Anything else

Use this section to request help, list pages that should be watched due to repeated vandalism, user webhosting, advertising, misleading quotes, copvio, etc. These pages are not yet protected or its members blocked. Please remove the points listed that are 3 days old or have taken admin action. When listing a vandal use: {{vandal|Type in offenders name here}}.

[edit] Associated Press

I felt it appropriate to create a redirect and category for the AP; this was a case where key details on the story came exclusively from them. Before I go archive trawling to see which other articles really belong in this category (if, in fact, any) I'd like some sort of agreed-on criteria. Blanket adding it based on searches could just add every story that uses them as a source; I think that's wrong, I think we should err on the side of caution, so add to/discuss the criteria below:

  1. AP is a critical source, possibly even originator of the story
  2. AP is the actual subject of our story
  3. AP is a major player in the story; such as responsible for widespread distribution of a hoax

Are there others to add to this? Any search tips for weeding out articles that don't need checked against these criteria? --Brian McNeil / talk 15:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm... this seems like an unusual use of categories, but I can't really see any problem with it. The criteria given sound reasonable, but I think the first should be applied very carefully - or it will end up with far too many members. In fact I'm not sure about the first article you added (Failed bomb aboard Delta flight), but I admit I didn't follow that story very closely so will defer to others' judgement.
If this is successful would we have similar categories for other major outlets? the wub "?!" 22:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
  • I have absolutely no problem with citing sources as a category where they're integral to the piece of news. I don't think Wikinews covered it, but the recent Northern Ireland debacle - with the First Minister's wife setting her toy-boy up in business - would be a classic example. The BBC, through an investigative piece, broke the story. This was what we'd normally have as a source actually making the news. In such circumstances I'm fully in favour of the news source being a category where the circumstances are like that. For AP? Very, very tricky. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Got a few minutes?

Does anyone have a couple of minutes to undo this [idiot]. I've got to run, but just so noone misses it. Cheers guys!   Tris   08:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Just spotted this, all cleaned up now. Special:Nuke is amazing, I've never had chance to use it before! the wub "?!" 10:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Oh wow! I left the message here because I thought I'd have to go through everyone and didn't have time for that! That could be fun-any idea what would happen if we did it to a proper contributor?   Tris   11:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
That is a cool tool! But what a mess a rogue admin could cause ... Cheers, --SVTCobra 23:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
/me is jealous, has wanted to try nuke, but hasn't had an opportunity. Bawolff 23:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Since it is such a powerful tool, I just wanted to make a note that I used it on Opa234 (talk · contribs). Cheers, --SVTCobra 23:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] abuse filter mismathch for Page blanking

Im Trying to Blank a spam page, someone delete it right pl0x 164.116.47.180 (talk) 17:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Done. Thanks fr pointing it out! Δενδοδγε τ\c 18:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
note: In future, you can add {{Delete|spam}} to top of the page to mark it as needing deletion. Cheers. Bawolff 18:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Is the Nuke Primed? i think we mght need to use it. 164.116.47.180 (talk) 18:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

  • Thank you. However Michaeldsuarez (withouth the dot) is not him, just got impersonated. Please see commons report. Thanks, Dferg (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Without the dot is him. Posted the exact same crap. Maybe there is a legit contributer elsewhere with that name who was impersonated, but not on Wikinews. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Navigation
Wikinews
In other languages
Regions
Toolbox