Comments:Canadian court clears Stephen Truscott of 1959 murder

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
 Regarding the trial  of Steven Truscott. Just finished the book by Julian Sher.  The main thing for me was why weren't those two children who saw him cross the bridge with girl on handlebars, then return to the bridge alone. Why didn't they believe them?  Not only that but the time of death was made to suit the time frame so the police could arrest Steven who they targeted right from the start.   ted bowles   australia--58.106.44.217 (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Truscott INNOCENT---TRUE[edit]

I have always believed that Stephen Truscott was innocent of this murder. Everyone is still wondering why Warren Hatharal wasnt further questioned concerning the lies that were told about him asking Stephen where did you dump the body after you killed her---and he said Stephen said in the river with the fish. This was proven to be a lie. Did Hatharol who was a teenager not only make up this story but encouraged other young people to agree with it and later they said it wasnt true. If these are the facts or are they rumors-why wasnt the liar punished and furthermore questioned further. Was he jealous of Truscott and did Hatharal have a fight with the murder victim in a fit of jealousy because she didnt want him. I dont know what happened but I do sincerely believe that Stephen was innocent. Did his conviction come from a young liar that asked his school pals to back him on his lies.

INNOCENT[edit]

unbelieveable!! this is just bullshit!@!@!@!@ trololololololol