This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Why not just vote on it? What happen too our democracy. Its new york I expect Gay marriage to be legalize in fair vote.--184.108.40.206 20:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
There will be a vote on it. They're called representatives for a reason. If someone wants to hold a referrendum, they're still free to do so by collecting enough signatures from voters. 220.127.116.11 02:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
should people be allowed to vote to prevent heteros from marrying? why then, would we allow a vote for homos? we do not live a democracy, but is rather a constitutional republic, where the rights of the minority are protected against the whim the of the majority. - Imind (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)