Comments:Studies: raw fish risky
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
This is one more reason for me to dislike this one person who forced me to eat raw fish... Mutton333 23:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC
The majority of the population of Japan thinks that the premise of this artcile is alarmist and exaggerated.
, these things (parasites) are actually not too difficult to pick out, and most other problems involve consuming organs (as opposed to meat).
Of course (disclaimer) I am a raw foodist type (or at least I play one on television)... of which the subject then brings even more WP-style "these people on the Internet can write _anything_" commotion. YMMV. 220.127.116.11 03:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)