MediaWiki talk:Gadget-UserMessages.js

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Added that in Preferences, but don't see any new GUI, no links or alerts or anything. How do I use this gadget? Gryllida 23:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be moved to ResourceLoader. I'd do that myself but I have no rights. Jkmartindale (talk) 09:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jkmartindale: Do you mean simply that it needs to have the ResourceLoader property listed in gadgets definitions, or is something more required? (I admit I'm very cynical about RL; but if it's the game that must be played, so be it.) --Pi zero (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Pi zero: You called my bluff, I actually don't know (all I know about ResourceLoader I learned today while trying to take my favorite gadgets from Wikimedia sites into my global.js file). The reason I think you need to use ResourceLoader is because Special:Gadgets is whining about it. James Martindale (talk) 11:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jkmartindale: A while ago we were told no gadget would be loaded unless it uses RL. I was told by a guru, though, that in practice all one usually had to do was to tell the gadgets extension the gadget uses RL. I note, though, that most of the javascript automation on en.wn now practically never loads on the first try; reloading a page once or twice is needed to get it all to work, which is why most gadgets now have a try block around them, which I'd tried in the apparently vain hope that it would containerize the failure of some gadgets so they wouldn't wreck others. I gather this is all thanks to the "improvements" being made to the platform. So I figure mostly what we need here is to eliminate our old js until there's nothing left of it — mostly I'd hope to migrate things to use wikidialog, which I've designed to be as robust as I could make it against changes to the platform (though there are always limits to what I can do; at some point I find I just have to hope WMF architectural decisions won't exceed some threshold of ill-conceivedness, which really isn't a sound assumption). --Pi zero (talk) 12:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]