Talk:21 people killed and 113 reported injured in three blasts in Mumbai
Some Mistakes might have occurred[edit]
Sirs, I am writing an article for Wikinews after a gap of 11 months. I do not know what systems you follow now. Also, some mistakes might have occurred in the writing. Please rectify them. I will go through all the guidelines pages once again during my leisure so that I may commit less mistakes from next time onwards. Thank you Srinivas 15:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1258645 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 1258645 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1258645 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Strange really, refer my collaberation talk to the rejected other article same subject. In any case though that one was said to be encyclopedic, this one could at least link the Wikipedia site as so much more informative. If Wikinews seek to be uptodate, complete and informative to readers why not quote the sister ship link at lest? Try iit as below.
Cheers reviewer, I am sure you appreciate my words are well intended, to reduce the subjective reviews I have seen lately.--Robbygay (talk) 01:48, 17 July 2011 (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_July_2011_Mumbai_bombings