Talk:Bans off Our Bodies protests occur across United States after leaked Supreme Court draft
Add topicGreetings @ Darkfrog24
- Just following alternate title came to my mind
- "'Bans off Our Bodies' protests break out across U.S.A."
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Suggesting clarity for 'it'
[edit]@ Darkfrog24
- " Through its agent Thomas Dobbs, 'it' asks the Supreme Court to overturn 'its' 1973 decision that women have a constitutional right to abortion. "
Pl. do see if clarifying 'it' would help.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Fixed it before I saw this, but I agree. Also, you don't need to ping any particular person on the article talk page; anyone can fix any problem. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Note to reviewers
[edit]My preference would be to add more information about how many people total attended the marches nationwide, but no sources available right now seem to tally that. Given the bottlenecks here at Wikinews, I'm deliberately erring on the side of more time. I'll check back for more sources later, but that's why I'm doing that. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Review of revision 4677444 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 4677444 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Very good work on an article covering a very contentious and divisive issue. Some changes had to be made because I couldn't find a source for them -- I erred on the side of removal here given the staleness window, check revision history. Otherwise, all good. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4677444 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Very good work on an article covering a very contentious and divisive issue. Some changes had to be made because I couldn't find a source for them -- I erred on the side of removal here given the staleness window, check revision history. Otherwise, all good. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |