Talk:British government considering new nuclear power stations
Add topic- The numbers in the Sunday Times article don't match the DUKES figures. DUKES is the most up-to-date and authorative source of UK energy stats, so I used its figures in preference. Dan100 (Talk) 16:25, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- If anyone cares, I was going to put this in:
This week, Oxford Economic Research Associates will publish a study claiming that meeting the 20% carbon dioxide reduction target would cost £4.4 billion using nuclear energy, but would require an investment of £12 billion to be met using wind power.
from the Sunday Times source. However when I double-checked I saw that the OXERA study wasn't referring to the 20% CO2 reduction target, but a seperate 20% renewable energy target. Of course, nuclear power is in no-way 'renewable', nor does the DTI regard it as such, so I think someone has slipped up here. Dan100 (Talk)
- <hmms and decides to be disputatious for the fun of it> Breeder reactors, while not precisely 'renewable', produce fuel whilst consuming it. - Amgine/talk 18:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about British government considering new nuclear power stations
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikinews the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve British government considering new nuclear power stations.