Talk:New York City disputes 2010 Census

Review of revision 1203855 [Failed]

Revision 1203855 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Requires categories Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1203855 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Requires categories Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Um, isn't it better to just fix minor mistakes like this yourself than fail the entire article? This is part of the reason review times are so long - unnecessary fails. Tempodivalse [talk] 23:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, this is my first article. I didn't mean for it to fail immediately. Phearson (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

You've got nothing to be sorry for; for a first article, this is an unusually good one at first glance. C628 (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1204289 [Passed]

Revision 1204289 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good article. Thanks for your contribution! Tempodivalse [talk] 20:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1204289 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good article. Thanks for your contribution! Tempodivalse [talk] 20:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.