Talk:Pentagon report to Congress mentions "conditions that could lead to civil war" in Iraq

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Murtha was a Democrat last time I checked. --vonbergm 19:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

indeed. Rama 19:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One sided[edit]

This article is very one sided. I am sure not all of Washington thinks there is going to be a civil war or that one exists. What about defense quotes from the President? There is only the nes of this new report in the 1st paragraph. The rest is basically blasting the US gov and does not give any defense to this report. Too one sided. Jason Safoutin 19:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

worst than one sided[edit]

I think and most people around the world think civil war is burning in Ikaq for months. I am very surprised by this report. It's obvious that civil war is occuring just viewing tv or reading news, no? or i do not share the same definition for civil war : citizen of the same country figthing each other in the name of : (a god, a chief, a wealth, a bit of territory, ...)

exemple : Iraq government asked to raise the national flag everywhere, Kurds refuse because this old flag is represent to much blood.

How is considered a US state refusing to raise the US flag ?

Jacques Divol 19:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques, the news coverage on this issue is quite different depending on which side of the atlantic you are on. And with it the notion of what is "obvious". :-) --vonbergm 20:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The news is precisely that the understanding of the situation in evolving: a civil war was what France, Germany and other feared to be a likely the outcome of the invasion; when the situation started worsening, the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" started losing its leafs; then the former British ambassador to Iraq and two US generals used the term "civil" war to describe the situation.
Now we see that the actual words "civil war" are present in a report by the Pentagon as an institution -- an institution lead by Rumsfeld, who recently suggested that comparing the people who are worried about Iraq and those who tried to appease Hitler is accurate and tasteful.
This is quite obviously a milestone in the evolving of the rethorics regarding Iraq. Rama 09:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current Iraq story running on the front page[edit]

How about we strip the facts from this article and add them to the article I already have running on the front page?

Suits me. Rama 09:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]