Comments from feedback form - "Missing key parts of the study..."

Missing key parts of the study (subjects, number of subjects, control group, etc.). Also, it takes a very biased point of view (perhaps by not providing key parts of the study).

Apologies if this is not in the correct place and/or format. Was there a link to the actual subject of the article? I was aunable to see a link that allowed me to even review the "key parts" mentioned above. 124.168.123.152 (talk) 07:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Published in The Lancet, which you generally have to buy access to. Sorry 'bout that, it's the only way many of these publications can keep afloat.