last seven articles in the list as of 05:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC) is about the US. It is closely related to the US, and not Russia. Just a mere mention of Russia, that too, in the quotes is not a good idea to categorise it for Russia, especially when we are not publishing anything about Russia, lately. I came here looking for Petr Pavlenski's article and all I see is US politics. Is it a category for Russia or for US politics? Russia is a lot bigger than that. If the article says about the "Russian interference", (which we don't even know if it is true) then categorise it under that category -- use more appropriate categories rather than the superset because it does not look good to see a list of some other country's politics in this cat.
acagastya PING ME! 05:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't read those articles, but I can tell that Russian interference is a suitable CAT for them, but Russia is not.
acagastya PING ME! 05:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)