Comments:Australia: Victorian government to trial driverless vehicles on public roads

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Interesting112:00, 13 August 2017


"The cars are to drive alongside commuters, but in public testing a driver is always to be present, as Victorian law requires drivers always keep a hand on the steering wheel. However, in occasional closures of the Burnley Tunnel, with no other drivers to endanger, the cars are to be tested with nobody in the vehicle."

I'm wondering how laws are treated in the latter case? Has an official exemption been given?

I expect such autonomous cars to work well at a highway (probably) but not at smaller roads where the situations are more unusual and exotic. (talk)10:43, 13 August 2017

I'd guess the wording of the law limits when it applies — for example, it might say to keep hold of the wheel "when driving on a public way", and they decided driving in a closed tunnel with nobody there wouldn't be public.

Pi zero (talk)12:00, 13 August 2017