Comments:Australian treasurer attacks opposition leader's tax question error

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

There is something I don't get about taxes: With higher taxes, the government gets more money... But with lower taxes there are more transactions resulting in things being better for commerce, individuals paying less taxes, and the government getting the money lost with the lower taxes from the extra transactions. Contralya 01:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

And so you do understand, grasshopper. It's the same for any business, lower your price (by lowering your profit margin) and you increase sales, hence profit; raise your prices and increase your profit margin, but reduce your sales. (Similarly, reduce quality, reduce costs, but perhaps reduce market share.) Every business needs to find the balance, the highest Profit = Sales X (Profit-Margin - Costs). Reduce your prices below this, and you hurt your profit more than your sales increase; increase your prices and you hurt your sales more than your profit increases.

Every country has a similar balance, between tax-rate and economic activity, to give the highest government revenue. (Similarly between the economic brake of taxation, and the social advantage of government spending; government's "cost vs quality".) The thing to remember is that there isn't a magic formula or model to tell you where the balance point is. So it generally comes down to ideology and hindsight, distorted by... well, distortions... such as economic booms/busts. "We are proven economic managers!!!" "No, they're just riding the resources boom, spending like drunken sailors!!!"