Comments:British Business Secretary Cable stripped of powers after 'totally unacceptable and inappropriate' comments
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Comments from feedback form - "Very decent article, would jus..." | 2 | 12:34, 22 December 2010 |
Very decent article, would just like to see a couple more sources from tabloid and right-wing media (to provide balance; not because I agree with them!!)
The two 'types' of sources you mention are, effectively, synonymous.
If Cable's comments are true, I agree with him wholeheartedly; Murdoch is a blight on journalism. The man gave up his Australian citizenship to start building Faux news. Should we use them as a source? Or The Sun? Perhaps the WSJ? Or, do we go for a non-Murdoch right-wing RedTop,... Like The Daily Mail? (The paper that backed Hitler).
Sources are only cited if information in them is actually used; see WN:CS.