Jump to content

Comments:British government apologises for suggesting the Pope could create a brand of "Benedict" condoms

Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 64.134.66.74 in topic This damages brainstorming

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "Not only should the Pope hand ..."

[edit]

Not only should the Pope hand out condoms he should have his photo on the packaging wearing one. It would do more for preventing abortions than all his sermons. 24.190.41.94 (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Which is the beauty of sex with underage males. No abortions necessary! Maybe that's why they aren't so interested in sponsoring contraception.
yeah, gay pedophile catholic joke; I can't help it when they give this much material. 70.50.113.183 (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Perfect length; took about 30 ..."

[edit]

Perfect length; took about 30 seconds to read. Although I wish it contained a sentence about the planned protest and/or Richard Dawkin's comment. Mdw1129 (talk) 23:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

This damages brainstorming

[edit]

They shouldn't apologize - it was a leaked brainstorm, not an official suggestion. Now every time they "brainstorm" in that office they'll have to censor themselves, and future visits will suffer from a lack of creativity. 64.134.66.74 (talk) 21:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply