Comments:Canadian foreign affairs minister resigns amid controversy
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Just another dumb ass french Canadian. Vive les Kaybec ! 76.64.162.151 00:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I find that highly inflammatory. Yes, he made a serious error in judgment, but that doesn't make him a dumbass. B2xiao (talk) 03:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Contents of documents[edit]
From what I've heard, the documents contain information on NATO activities. Can anyone else verify this?
I recall hearing that the French foreign affairs office was getting a bit riled (while Harper was in France, no less) over the idea that private French NATO information could have been leaked. B2xiao (talk) 03:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)